Chiudi

Aggiungi l'articolo in

Chiudi
Aggiunto

L’articolo è stato aggiunto alla lista dei desideri

Chiudi

Crea nuova lista

Stripe PDP Libri EN
Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution - Louis Fisher - cover
Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution - Louis Fisher - cover
Dati e Statistiche
Wishlist Salvato in 0 liste dei desideri
Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution
Disponibile in 3 settimane
35,12 €
35,12 €
Disp. in 3 settimane
Chiudi
Altri venditori
Prezzo e spese di spedizione
ibs
35,12 € Spedizione gratuita
disponibile in 3 settimane disponibile in 3 settimane
Info
Nuovo
Altri venditori
Prezzo e spese di spedizione
ibs
35,12 € Spedizione gratuita
disponibile in 3 settimane disponibile in 3 settimane
Info
Nuovo
Altri venditori
Prezzo e spese di spedizione
Chiudi

Tutti i formati ed edizioni

Chiudi
Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution - Louis Fisher - cover
Chiudi

Promo attive (0)

Descrizione


Federal judges, legal scholars, pundits, and reporters frequently describe the Supreme Court as the final word on the meaning of the Constitution. The historical record presents an entirely different picture. A close and revealing reading of that record, from 1789 to the present day, Reconsidering Judicial Finality reminds us of the “unalterable fact,” as Chief Justice Rehnquist once remarked, “that our judicial system, like the human beings who administer it, is fallible.” And a Court inevitably prone to miscalculation and error, as this book clearly demonstrates, cannot have the incontrovertible last word on constitutional questions.In this deeply researched, sharply reasoned work of legal myth-busting, constitutional scholar Louis Fisher explains how constitutional disputes are settled by all three branches of government, and by the general public, with the Supreme Court often playing a secondary role. The Court’s decisions have, of course, been challenged and reversed in numerous cases—involving slavery, civil rights, child labor legislation, Japanese internment during World War II, abortion, and religious liberty. What Fisher shows us on a case-by-case basis is how the elected branches, scholars, and American public regularly press policies contrary to Court rulings—and regularly prevail, although the process might sometimes take decades. From the common misreading of Marbury v. Madison, to the mistaken understanding of the Supreme Court as the trusted guardian of individual rights, to the questionable assumptions of the Court’s decision in Citizens United, Fisher’s work charts the distance and the difference between the Court as the ultimate arbiter in constitutional matters and the judgment of history. The verdict of Reconsidering Judicial Finality is clear: to treat the Supreme Court’s nine justices as democracy’s last hope or as dangerous activists undermining democracy is to vest them with undue significance. The Constitution belongs to all three branches of government—and, finally, to the American people.
Leggi di più Leggi di meno

Dettagli

2023
Paperback / softback
288 p.
Testo in English
229 x 152 mm
272 gr.
9780700636075
Chiudi
Aggiunto

L'articolo è stato aggiunto al carrello

Chiudi

Aggiungi l'articolo in

Chiudi
Aggiunto

L’articolo è stato aggiunto alla lista dei desideri

Chiudi

Crea nuova lista

Chiudi

Chiudi

Siamo spiacenti si è verificato un errore imprevisto, la preghiamo di riprovare.

Chiudi

Verrai avvisato via email sulle novità di Nome Autore